PM4HIRE.COM separately reviews each site that you operate in order to identify what backup potential exists from one site for other sites. We also keep track of statistics produced by agencies like FEMA to put your risk into perspective and to devise backup plans that make sense. The purpose of a backup plan is not to pacify the shareholders, it is used to facilitate an orderly transfer of operations so that business continues, but we have seen examples that read a lot like fiction and that would be unlikely to be of much use in the event of a disaster of any significant proportion. Perhaps your site is inherently vulnerable to many events, and perhaps you should consider relocating to a more secure site. Only a comprehensive exposure analysis will help you to establish your options.
A vulnerability assessment determines what the critical functions are that must be resumed within an hour, or 4 hours, or 12 hours, and so on. This identifies where people need to concentrate their efforts to get you back in operation. Vulnerability includes financial and physical assets, including lost revenue, recovery costs, potential fines and penalties, loss of goodwill, delayed receivables collection, and so forth. There may be specialized equipment on site that is hard to replace and that may make a timely recovery difficult (unless you want spare facilities installed elsewhere). Our methodology lists a number of human impacts, property impacts, as well as business impacts, and it incorporates a systems analysis process to show the ripple effect of one disaster that can broaden the overall impact and to calculate the consequences of different simulated disaster events to provide you with the information you need to implement a disaster response plan.
With respect to any loss assessment we always focus first on preventing loss of life and on reducing the risk of injuries in general, irrespective of the financial exposure to the company. We would never expect employees to put themselves at risk to save company assets. Beyond that, we look at insurance to minimize the financial loss exposures and we look at prevention to minimize the risk of an event having such far ranging consequences. It is important to restate the risk in monetary terms in order to assess the feasibility of countermeasures that reduce that risk, or that reduce the cost of insuring against that risk, if that proves to be cost effective. We are always on guard against the incorrect use of statistics: probabilities are not very useful if one occurrence can wipe out the company.
To consider a loss assessment we need to understand the Executive Management view on risk exposure before we can propose adequate protection for the business. We may need to interview operating staff to understand the impact of various outages. We generally need to focus on the more serious impacts because any prevention or mitigation will automatically benefit the lesser impacts, but the reverse is not always true. Even if not all risks can be prevented or mitigated, at least you will have a list of weaknesses that will not become surprises in the event a disaster strikes. Some of these weaknesses may be addressed in a longer term plan, perhaps by relocating the business to a less vulnerable venue.
|